The decline of Russia’s oligarchs (BBC)


By James Rodgers
Analysis, BBC News

Oleg Deripaska with Prime Minister Putin, Sochi , Sept 2008

PM Putin forced Mr Deripaska to reopen an aluminium plant in June

If you look up the word “oligarch” in the dictionary, you will find it means a member of a small group holding power in a state.

Today, though, it usually refers to the super-rich Russians who made their fortunes in the sometimes barbaric business world of their country in the 1990s.

In some cases, they sought to convert their new financial clout into political influence.

They grew even richer as oil prices and the Moscow stock markets soared in the boom years which followed.

Then, 12 months ago, as the global financial crisis reached Russia, the oligarchs got a shock.

“They have taken the biggest hit because they had the most to lose,” says Chris Weafer, chief strategist at Uralsib, a banking and investment company based in Moscow.

“The stock market in the second half of last year fell almost 75%, and we’ve seen that reflected in the Forbes list of billionaires et cetera,” Mr Weafer says.

“Just looking at the wealth of these individuals, they’ve taken a huge hit – hundreds of billions of dollars have been wiped from the value they had in the middle of 2008.”

There is no formal oligarchs’ club or association – and the way individuals have fared has varied depending on where their money was invested.

But any list of wealthy Russian businessmen would be likely to include Roman Abramovich – most famous outside Russia as owner of Chelsea football club – aluminium magnate Oleg Deripaska and Boris Berezovsky, who has become an implacable opponent of the current Russian leadership. He now lives in Britain.

Public humiliation

As the crisis hit home, some of Russia’s richest ran into difficulties.

Today it’s very, very clear who’s calling the shots, and it’s not the oligarchs
Chris Weafer
Chief strategist, Uralsib

In June, Mr Deripaska found himself in a piece of political theatre on Russia’s biggest stage: the national television news.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin arrived in the northern Russian town of Pikalyevo to deliver a public reprimand to Mr Deripaska and others with a stake in the town’s main factory. Workers had not been getting their wages.

Viewers saw Mr Putin call Mr Deripaska forward. He ordered him to sign an agreement to solve the problem.

It looked like a teacher telling off a pupil – especially when Mr Putin asked for his pen back.

“It’s a very Russian approach. Nobody in Russia was surprised,” says Zoya Trunova, an editor at the BBC’s Russian Service.

“Everyone thought, ‘Well, that’s a fair thing to do. What else would the prime minister be doing?’ And then Deripaska looked very intimidated by that, but then he would do what he was told, but obviously the state feels that oligarchs are almost their own team of people so they can tell them what to do.”

This shift in power did not just come with the economic crisis. Vladimir Putin seems to have decided, as soon as he first rose to political prominence ten years ago, to rein in the oligarchs.

“He’s made it very clear that he expects the oligarchs to look after the workers, to help the government in terms of the stimulus package,” says Chris Weafer. “And today I think it’s very, very clear who’s calling the shots, and it’s not the oligarchs.”

Staging a comeback

The oligarchs’ global fame – or notoriety – has been built on tales of extravagance.

Boris Berezovsky in London 2007

Dissident billionaire Boris Berezovsky lives in London

Stewart Lansley – a co-author of the book, Londongrad, about their lives in the British capital – says their reduced spending actually fuelled the downturn in the luxury goods market in Britain. Now, he says, they’re returning.

“What’s happened in the last couple of months is that the Russians have been creeping back. There’s evidence already that they’ve started looking for bargains in a number of areas, they’ve been reappearing in jewellery shops, they’ve been reappearing buying Rolls Royces and top end cars.”

The oligarchs have usually excelled at reading the Russian political situation. Jonathan Eyal, from the Royal United Services Institute in London, agrees that the government currently has a political advantage – but, he argues, that does not mean that the oligarchs are finished.

“The oligarchs have many opportunities of influencing Russian political life, partly because Russian political life is itself now quite brittle,” Mr Eyal says.

“We have a double-headed leadership – on the one hand, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, on the other hand President Medvedev – and in that kind of a structure the oligarchs will always find a weak point, or will always be able to divide and rule.”

The dictionary definition of oligarch doesn’t refer to wealth. Russia’s oligarchs have definitely lost part of theirs, and, as a result, they may also lose some of the “power they hold in the state”.

Given their proven ability to survive and prosper in the toughest of times, they are not about to disappear.

You can hear James Rodgers’ piece on the BBC World Service Analysis programme on Monday 31 August.

,

  1. #1 by Gints Salaks on August 31st, 2009

    Just wanted to comment on the last paragraph. “Given their proven ability to survive and prosper in the toughest of times, they are not about to disappear.”
    If you look at the Russia’s history, it is very true that Russia and Russians get together at toughest times. Russians are very good at surviving hard times. The harder it gets, the stronger they get. You need to keep it in your mind when you talk about Russia that it might seem that their military and economical situation is low, but there will be a need, they will figure out how to improve it!

  2. #2 by Elena on August 31st, 2009

    Good observation although I must disagree with one minor point. They do survive, and will continue to do so regardless of what comes their way… but they do not do it together. Even during the communist era, you can see the tendency for individualism to emerge. Maybe it is because they feel wronged by the social system, they tend to fend for themselves, which inturn leads to mistrust and abuse of power (if they get it).

(will not be published)

  1. No trackbacks yet.